| Title |
Displacement of Japanese native bumblebees by the recently introduced Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-007-9071-z |
| Authors |
Maki N. Inoue, Jun Yokoyama, Izumi Washitani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 22% |
| Researcher | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 126 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,180,592
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#110
of 745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,604
of 91,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.