↓ Skip to main content

Distinguishing signals and cues: bumblebees use general footprints to generate adaptive behaviour at flowers and nest

Overview of attention for article published in Arthropod-Plant Interactions, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Distinguishing signals and cues: bumblebees use general footprints to generate adaptive behaviour at flowers and nest
Published in
Arthropod-Plant Interactions, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11829-007-9011-6
Authors

Nehal Saleh, Alan G. Scott, Gareth P. Bryning, Lars Chittka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 124 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 23%
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 66%
Environmental Science 17 12%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Chemistry 2 1%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 19 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2009.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Arthropod-Plant Interactions
#91
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,331
of 67,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthropod-Plant Interactions
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them