↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Micro-Enterprise Services on HIV Risk Behaviour Among Female Sex Workers in Kenya’s Urban Slums

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Micro-Enterprise Services on HIV Risk Behaviour Among Female Sex Workers in Kenya’s Urban Slums
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10461-008-9485-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willis Omondi Odek, Joanna Busza, Chester N. Morris, John Cleland, Elizabeth N. Ngugi, Alan G. Ferguson

Abstract

This study assessed individual-level effects of adding micro-enterprise services to a peer-mediated HIV/AIDS intervention among 227 female sex workers (FSWs) in Kenya. Survey data were collected in May-July 2003 and July-August 2005. Two-thirds of participants had operational businesses by end-line survey. Nearly half reported to have stopped sex work. Self-reported weekly mean number of all sexual partners changed from 3.26 (SD 2.45) at baseline to 1.84 (SD 2.15) at end-line survey (P < 0.001). Weekly mean number of casual partners did not change significantly. Weekly mean number of regular partners changed from 1.96 (SD 1.86) to 0.73 (SD 0.98) over the follow-up period (P < 0.001). Consistent condom use with regular partners increased by 18.5% and remained above 90% with casual partners. Micro-enterprise services may empower FSWs by giving them an alternative livelihood when they wish to exit or reduce reliance on sex work. Determinants of successful business operation by FSWs deserve further research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 139 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 43 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Psychology 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,396,539
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#2,354
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,079
of 93,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.