Title |
Volcanic lightning: global observations and constraints on source mechanisms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00445-010-0393-4 |
Authors |
Stephen R. McNutt, Earle R. Williams |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 21% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 12% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 7% |
Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,524,418
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#37
of 1,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,819
of 101,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them