↓ Skip to main content

The influence of different preparation methods on the aggregation status of pyrogenic nanosilicas used in concrete

Overview of attention for article published in Materials and Structures, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
The influence of different preparation methods on the aggregation status of pyrogenic nanosilicas used in concrete
Published in
Materials and Structures, July 2012
DOI 10.1617/s11527-012-9889-z
Authors

A. Bagheri, T. Parhizkar, H. Madani, A. M. Raisghasemi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Student > Master 7 17%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 46%
Materials Science 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,544,407
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Materials and Structures
#76
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,220
of 165,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials and Structures
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.