↓ Skip to main content

Linking breeding and wintering grounds of neotropical migrant songbirds using stable hydrogen isotopic analysis of feathers

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, December 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
478 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
Title
Linking breeding and wintering grounds of neotropical migrant songbirds using stable hydrogen isotopic analysis of feathers
Published in
Oecologia, December 1996
DOI 10.1007/s004420050068
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. A. Hobson, Leonard I. Wassenaar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Canada 6 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 324 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 22%
Researcher 63 18%
Student > Master 58 16%
Other 25 7%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Other 72 20%
Unknown 34 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 217 62%
Environmental Science 51 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 6%
Chemistry 4 1%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 41 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,774
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,846
of 92,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.