↓ Skip to main content

Die Malaria im Römischen Kaiserreich: eine bemerkenswerte Textstelle in den Digesten

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Medica Austriaca, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Die Malaria im Römischen Kaiserreich: eine bemerkenswerte Textstelle in den Digesten
Published in
Acta Medica Austriaca, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00508-008-1033-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas R. Hassl

Abstract

The significance of malaria for the decadence and the final fall of the Western Roman Empire is discussed controversially. It seems verisimilar that Central Europe was free of malaria at the end of the last ice age, and it is undisputed that the Apennine peninsula was a substantially depopulated, endemic malaria area around 600 A.D. The immigration of three of the four Plasmodium species infectious for man took place most likely at different era and with very different effects on the antique societies. A text passage in the Digesta of Justinian (D 21.1.1.8), written by the post classical jurist Ulpian (approx. 170-223 A.D.), illuminates selectively in region and period the malaria situation of the social underclass in and around Rome, a city with a population over a million at that time. The quotation indicates, shortened, "that an old Quartana, about which one does not have to worry any longer, is not an argument for a warranty for defects in case of slaves bought at the market". From this annotation one can deduce that at the turn of the second to the third century A.D. Quartana recrudescence represented the medical normality for people from the social underclass in Rome and the surrounding area. Thus, while at that time Plasmodium malariae seemed to be a common part of the human parasite fauna in Latium, Malaria tropica and Malaria tertiana did not yet unfold their depopulating, economically and socially devastating effects; this happened several centuries later, although the existence of at least one effective vector is proven.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#284
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,705
of 101,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.