↓ Skip to main content

Stratigraphy and Isotope Ages of Lunar Geologic Units: Chronological Standard for the Inner Solar System

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
26 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Stratigraphy and Isotope Ages of Lunar Geologic Units: Chronological Standard for the Inner Solar System
Published in
Space Science Reviews, April 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011937020193
Authors

D. Stöffler, G. Ryder

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Other 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Professor 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 57 60%
Physics and Astronomy 13 14%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#533
of 1,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,511
of 43,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.