| Title |
The Hand That Feeds the Monkey: Mutual Influence of Humans and Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) in the Context of Provisioning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10764-018-0014-1 |
| Authors |
Asmita Sengupta, Sindhu Radhakrishna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 31% |
| India | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 14% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,902,009
of 24,278,128 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#121
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,003
of 449,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,278,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.