↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetics Offer New Horizons for Colorectal Cancer Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Current Colorectal Cancer Reports, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Epigenetics Offer New Horizons for Colorectal Cancer Prevention
Published in
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11888-011-0116-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Schnekenburger, Marc Diederich

Abstract

In recent years, colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence has been increasing to become a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide from cancers, with high rates in westernized societies and increasing rates in developing countries. Epigenetic modifications including changes in DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs play a critical role in carcinogenesis. Epidemiological data suggest that, in comparison to other cancers, these alterations are particularly common within the gastrointestinal tract. To explain these observations, environmental factors and especially diet were suggested to both prevent and induce CRC. Epigenetic alterations are, in contrast to genetic modifications, potentially reversible, making the use of dietary agents a promising approach in CRC for the development of chemopreventive strategies targeting epigenetic mechanisms. This review focuses on CRC-related epigenetic alterations as a rationale for various levels of prevention strategies and their potential modulation by natural dietary compounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Croatia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 20%
Student > Master 23 19%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Other 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 18%
Chemistry 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Current Colorectal Cancer Reports
#245
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,804
of 249,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Colorectal Cancer Reports
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.