↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen Sulfide and Colonic Epithelial Metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, August 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Hydrogen Sulfide and Colonic Epithelial Metabolism
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, August 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1010661706385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jimmy Jørgensen, Per Brøbech Mortensen

Abstract

Hydrogen sulfide (HS-) impairs the oxidation of butyrate in colonocytes and is found in excess in feces of patients with ulcerative colitis. The possible pathogenic role of HS- in ulcerative colitis was further investigated. To investigate the metabolic effect of free and bound fecal HS-, isolated rat colonocytes were incubated in the presence of butyrate without and with the addition of (1) HS- in water, (2) sterile filtrates of fecal homogenates supplemented and incubated with HS- and known sources of fecal HS- production, and (3) HS- incubated with fecal agents known to bind HS-. Oxidation rates were obtained by quantifying the production of CO2. Total and free HS-, as well as the fecal ability to bind HS-, were determined in health and ulcerative colitis. Compared to the production of CO2 by colonocytes incubated with 2 mmol/liter of butyrate, the further addition of 1.25 and 2.5 mmol/liter of HS- in water reduced the production of CO2 by 57.6+/-10.0 and 98.9+/-1.4%, respectively. However, when adding fecal filtrate of homogenate supplemented with HS- corresponding to 1.25 and 2.5 mmol/liter of HS- in water, the reduction of CO2 production was only 30.7+/-12.0 and 53.2+/-14.0%, respectively. Neither the fecal level of total or free HS- nor the remarkable fecal ability to bind HS- differed in health or quiescent and active ulcerative colitis. Bound HS- had no or little effect on CO2 production. Addition of fecal filtrate of nonsupplemented homogenate to colonocytes significantly reduced the oxidation of butyrate to CO2 about 25%, which could not be ascribed to fecal HS-. In conclusion, fecal HS- has little effect on butyrate oxidation in colonocytes and does not seem to play a pathogenic role for UC by impairing colonic epithelial metabolism. Other fecal agents seem to be more potent metabolic inhibitors than fecal HS-. The role of colonic contents in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis remains circumstantial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 28%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1,546
of 4,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,857
of 40,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.