↓ Skip to main content

The Incidence of Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery Among Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
The Incidence of Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery Among Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10620-005-3047-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Alexander Cole, Jason M. Yeaw, Jennifer A. Cutone, Braden Kuo, Zhiping Huang, David L. Earnest, Alexander M. Walker

Abstract

Rates of abdominopelvic surgery, with a particular focus on gallbladder procedures, were measured in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (n = 108,936) and compared with those in a general population sample (n = 223,082). The patient sample was selected from persons who were members of a managed care organization during the years 1995-2000. Medical records from a randomly selected subset of IBS patients were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis. Crude and standardized rates and adjusted rate ratios for surgery were calculated. The incidence of abdominopelvic surgery, excluding gallbladder procedures, was 87% higher in patients with IBS than that for the general population. The incidence of gallbladder surgery was threefold higher in IBS patients than the general population. Patients with IBS have an increased risk for abdominopelvic and gallbladder surgery and, thus, an associated risk for experiencing morbidity and mortality associated with these surgical procedures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Unspecified 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,017,235
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#738
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,368
of 150,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.