Title |
Role of N-glycans in growth factor signaling
|
---|---|
Published in |
Glycoconjugate Journal, April 2003
|
DOI | 10.1023/b:glyc.0000024252.63695.5c |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Motoko Takahashi, Takeo Tsuda, Yoshitaka Ikeda, Koichi Honke, Naoyuki Taniguchi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 32% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 40% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Glycoconjugate Journal
#114
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,160
of 63,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Glycoconjugate Journal
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.