↓ Skip to main content

Zwei neue Filarien (s. l.), Eufilaria delicata spec. nov. und Ornithofilaria böhmi spec. nov. aus der Misteldrossel, Turdus viscivorus L.

Overview of attention for article published in Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, July 1958
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Zwei neue Filarien (s. l.), Eufilaria delicata spec. nov. und Ornithofilaria böhmi spec. nov. aus der Misteldrossel, Turdus viscivorus L.
Published in
Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, July 1958
DOI 10.1007/bf00259661
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rudolf Supperer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde
#16
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them