↓ Skip to main content

Expert Stakeholders’ Views on the Management of Human Pharmaceuticals in the Environment

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Expert Stakeholders’ Views on the Management of Human Pharmaceuticals in the Environment
Published in
Environmental Management, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00267-005-0306-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nora A. Doerr-MacEwen, Murray E. Haight

Abstract

Human pharmaceuticals are ubiquitous water contaminants that may have subtle detrimental effects on aquatic organisms, and possibly also on human health. The risks of pharmaceuticals, or pharmaceutically active compounds, remain poorly understood. Awareness of the presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment, coupled with evidence of effects such as fish feminization, however, suggest that precautionary management action to reduce the release of pharmaceuticals to the environment should be considered. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the scope of the issue and possible management strategies from the perspectives of expert stakeholders, drawn from government, academia, and the pharmaceutical and consulting industries, involved in scientific research or policy and management activity, from Canada, the United States, and Europe. Twenty-seven interviewees were asked about their views on management strategies such as pharmaceutical-return programs and incentives for the development of "green" pharmaceuticals. Interviewees generally believed that pharmaceuticals in the environment represented a concern for both human and ecosystem health, although they were more concerned about impacts on aquatic ecosystems. They believed that advanced wastewater treatment technology, education of medical professionals to reduce overprescription, pharmaceutical-return programs coupled with public education, and requirements for all municipalities to have a minimum of secondary wastewater treatment were the most effective management strategies to reduce the environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals. These strategies should be considered by governments interested in managing the risks of human pharmaceuticals in the environment. Combinations of management strategies will likely be most effective in mitigating the risks presented by pharmaceuticals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Denmark 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 115 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 22 18%
Chemistry 13 10%
Engineering 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 36 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#737
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,523
of 88,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.