↓ Skip to main content

Taking stock of research methods and analysis on oppositional political terrorism

Overview of attention for article published in The American Sociologist, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Taking stock of research methods and analysis on oppositional political terrorism
Published in
The American Sociologist, June 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf02692395
Authors

Jeffrey Ian Ross

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 14%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 52%
Psychology 5 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The American Sociologist
#80
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,562
of 59,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Sociologist
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.