↓ Skip to main content

Transferability of SSR markers among wheat, rye, and triticale

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Transferability of SSR markers among wheat, rye, and triticale
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, December 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00122-003-1532-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Kuleung, P. S. Baenziger, I. Dweikat

Abstract

Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are a valuable tool for many purposes, such as mapping, fingerprinting, and breeding. However, they are only available in some economically important crops because of the high cost and labor intensity involved in their development. Comparative mapping reveals a high degree of colinearity between closely related species, which allows the exchange of markers between them. Our objective was to examine the transferability of SSR markers among wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), rye ( Secale cereale L.), and triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack). One hundred forty-eight wheat and 28 rye SSR markers were used to amplify genomic DNA extracted from five lines each of wheat, rye, and triticale. Transferability of wheat SSR markers to rye was 17%, whereas 25% of rye markers were amplifiable in wheat. In triticale, 58% and 39% transferability was achieved for wheat and rye markers, respectively. Wheat markers gave an average of 2.6, 2.7, and 2.4 polymorphic bands in wheat, rye, and triticale, respectively, while rye markers gave an average of 2.0 in rye and none in wheat and triticale. These transferable markers can now be exploited for further genetic and breeding studies in these species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 83 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2009.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,366
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,353
of 136,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.