↓ Skip to main content

The predominant learning approaches of medical students

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
The predominant learning approaches of medical students
Published in
BMC Medical Education, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12909-018-1122-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonali Prashant Chonkar, Tam Cam Ha, Sarah Shan Hang Chu, Ada Xinhui Ng, Melissa Li Shan Lim, Tat Xin Ee, Mor Jack Ng, Kok Hian Tan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Master 17 10%
Lecturer 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 60 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Psychology 8 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 63 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#17,926,658
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,633
of 3,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,599
of 441,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#49
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.