↓ Skip to main content

Effects of environmental stress on intertidal mussels and their sea star predators

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Effects of environmental stress on intertidal mussels and their sea star predators
Published in
Oecologia, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00442-008-1018-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura E. Petes, Morgan E. Mouchka, Ruth H. Milston-Clements, Tracey S. Momoda, Bruce A. Menge

Abstract

Consumer stress models of ecological theory predict that predators are more susceptible to stress than their prey. Intertidal mussels, Mytilus californianus, span a vertical stress gradient from the low zone (lower stress) to the high zone (higher thermal and desiccation stress), while their sea star predators, Pisaster ochraceus, range from the low zone only into the lower edge of the mussel zone. In summer 2003, we tested the responses of sea stars and mussels to environmental stress in an experiment conducted on the Oregon coast. Mussels were transplanted from the middle of the mussel bed to cages in the low and high edges of the mussel bed. Sea star predators were added to half of the mussel cages. Mussels and sea stars were sampled between June and August for indicators of sublethal stress. Mussel growth was measured, and tissues were collected for heat shock protein (Hsp70) analyses and histological analyses of reproduction. Sea stars were weighed, and tissues were sampled for Hsp70 analyses. Mussels in high-edge cages had higher levels of total Hsp70 and exhibited spawning activity earlier in the summer than mussels in the low-edge cages. Sea stars suffered high mortality in the high edge, and low-edge sea stars lost weight but showed no differences in Hsp70 production. These results suggest that stress in the intertidal zone affected the mobile predator more than its sessile prey, which is consistent with predictions of consumer stress models.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 149 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 28 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 48%
Environmental Science 31 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,672
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,593
of 81,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.