↓ Skip to main content

The Sixth Catalogue of galactic Wolf-Rayet stars, their past and present

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, September 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
321 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
The Sixth Catalogue of galactic Wolf-Rayet stars, their past and present
Published in
Space Science Reviews, September 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf00173260
Authors

Karel A. Van Der Hucht, Peter S. Conti, Ingemar Lundström, Björn Stenholm

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 50%
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 80%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#464
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,861
of 7,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them