↓ Skip to main content

The logic of inexact concepts

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, April 1969
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
750 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The logic of inexact concepts
Published in
Synthese, April 1969
DOI 10.1007/bf00485654
Authors

J. A. Goguen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Slovakia 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 72 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 22 28%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 23 29%
Philosophy 11 14%
Mathematics 9 11%
Engineering 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,564,893
of 24,337,175 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#809
of 2,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#553
of 2,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,337,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them