↓ Skip to main content

On growth, feeding and reproduction in the chitonMopalia muscosa of Santa Monica Bay

Overview of attention for article published in Helgoland Marine Research, December 1964
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
On growth, feeding and reproduction in the chitonMopalia muscosa of Santa Monica Bay
Published in
Helgoland Marine Research, December 1964
DOI 10.1007/bf01612371
Authors

Richard A. Boolootian

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 62%
Environmental Science 2 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2009.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Helgoland Marine Research
#85
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#872
of 10,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Helgoland Marine Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them