↓ Skip to main content

Phylogeographic differentiation of storm petrels (Hydrobates pelagicus) based on cytochrome b mitochondrial DNA variation

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Phylogeographic differentiation of storm petrels (Hydrobates pelagicus) based on cytochrome b mitochondrial DNA variation
Published in
Marine Biology, June 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00227-004-1407-6
Authors

C. Cagnon, B. Lauga, G. Hémery, C. Mouchès

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Mexico 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 73 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Researcher 18 22%
Student > Master 12 14%
Other 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 64%
Environmental Science 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 7 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,238
of 3,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,498
of 53,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.