↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomy and phylogeny of reed warblers (genusAcrocephalus) based on mtDNA sequences and morphology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Taxonomy and phylogeny of reed warblers (genusAcrocephalus) based on mtDNA sequences and morphology
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, October 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf01651381
Authors

Bernd Leisler, Petra Heidrich, Karl Schulze-Hagen, Michael Wink

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 27%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 58%
Environmental Science 14 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#774
of 1,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,366
of 28,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them