↓ Skip to main content

Constitutive arginine-dependent nitric oxide synthase activity in different organs of pea seedlings during plant development

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
265 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Constitutive arginine-dependent nitric oxide synthase activity in different organs of pea seedlings during plant development
Published in
Planta, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00425-005-0205-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco J. Corpas, Juan B. Barroso, Alfonso Carreras, Raquel Valderrama, José M. Palma, Ana M. León, Luisa M. Sandalio, Luis A del Río

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important signalling molecule in different animal and plant physiological processes. Little is known about its biological function in plants and on the enzymatic source or site of NO production during plant development. The endogenous NO production from L-arginine (NO synthase activity) was analyzed in leaves, stems and roots during plant development, using pea seedlings as a model. NOS activity was analyzed using a novel chemiluminescence-based assay which is more sensitive and specific than previous methods used in plant tissues. In parallel, NO accumulation was analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy using as fluorescent probes either DAF-2 DA or DAF-FM DA. A strong increase in NOS activity was detected in stems after 11 days growth, coinciding with the maximum stem elongation. The arginine-dependent NOS activity was constitutive and sensitive to aminoguanidine, a well-known irreversible inhibitor of animal NOS, and this NOS activity was differentially modulated depending on the plant organ and seedling developmental stage. In all tissues studied, NO was localized mainly in the vascular tissue (xylem) and epidermal cells and in root hairs. These loci of NO generation and accumulation suggest novel functions for NO in these cell types.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cyprus 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
China 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Engineering 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#599
of 2,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,053
of 154,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.