↓ Skip to main content

Continuous Exposure to Microplastics Does Not Cause Physiological Effects in the Cultivated Mussel Perna perna

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
Continuous Exposure to Microplastics Does Not Cause Physiological Effects in the Cultivated Mussel Perna perna
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00244-018-0504-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina F. M. Santana, Fabiana T. Moreira, Camilo D. S. Pereira, Denis M. S. Abessa, Alexander Turra

Abstract

The environmental impact of microplastics is a challenging theme, especially under realistic experimental conditions. We investigated physiological responses to 0.1-1.0 μm PVC particles intake by the mussel Perna perna after a relative long-term exposure (90 days) at a less extreme concentration compared with previous studies (0.125 g/L). Microplastic intake was inferred by the presence of PVC in the feces of mussels, and physiological damages were assessed through ingestion rate, assimilation efficiency, growth rate, cellular and molecular biomarkers (lysosomal integrity, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage), and condition index. All physiological responses showed nonsignificant effects of the microplastics on the exposed mussels. We suggest that, despite the experimental concentration of microplastics, mussels were able to acclimate to the exposure through their abilities for long-term recovery and tolerance to stresses. These data have positive implications for environmental health and in terms of human food resource because mussel farming is a worldwide practice that heavily relies on plastic materials, increasing the chances of microplastic exposure and mussels contamination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 237 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 94 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 64 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 106 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,117,202
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#575
of 2,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,502
of 451,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.