You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake: comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biogeosciences, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.5194/bg-15-429-2018 |
| Authors |
Kukka-Maaria Erkkilä, Anne Ojala, David Bastviken, Tobias Biermann, Jouni J. Heiskanen, Anders Lindroth, Olli Peltola, Miitta Rantakari, Timo Vesala, Ivan Mammarella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Finland | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 67 | 36% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 54 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,504,021
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biogeosciences
#1,080
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,314
of 456,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeosciences
#28
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.