↓ Skip to main content

Pseudomonas Invasion of Type I Pneumocytes Is Dependent on the Expression and Phosphorylation of Caveolin-2*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pseudomonas Invasion of Type I Pneumocytes Is Dependent on the Expression and Phosphorylation of Caveolin-2*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, November 2004
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m411702200
Pubmed ID
Authors

David W. Zaas, Mathew J. Duncan, Guojie Li, Jo Rae Wright, Soman N. Abraham

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major cause of pneumonia in patients with cystic fibrosis and other immuncompromising conditions. Here we showed that P. aeruginosa invades type I pneumocytes via a lipid raft-mediated mechanism. P. aeruginosa invasion of rat primary type I-like pneumocytes as well as a murine lung epithelial cell line 12 (MLE-12) is inhibited by drugs that remove membrane cholesterol and disrupt lipid rafts. Confocal microscopy demonstrated co-localization of intracellular P. aeruginosa with lipid raft components including caveolin-1 and -2. We generated caveolin-1 and -2 knockdowns in MLE-12 cells by using RNA interference techniques. Decreased expression of caveolin-2 significantly impaired the ability of P. aeruginosa to invade MLE-12 cells. In addition, the lipid raft-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of caveolin-2 appeared to be a critical regulator of P. aeruginosa invasion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#32,957
of 85,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,174
of 69,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#298
of 753 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 753 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.