↓ Skip to main content

Intrarenal venous glucose levels in the dog: An evaluation of the sampling technique

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Intrarenal venous glucose levels in the dog: An evaluation of the sampling technique
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf01990373
Pubmed ID
Authors

Th. V. Peterson, N. L. Chase

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2,146
of 5,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,290
of 8,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.