↓ Skip to main content

Alternative seed-handling strategies in primates: seed-spitting by long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis)

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Alternative seed-handling strategies in primates: seed-spitting by long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis)
Published in
Oecologia, February 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00323531
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. T. Corlett, P. W. Lucas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 55%
Environmental Science 19 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,673
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,500
of 57,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.