| Title |
An Historic Chinese Abalone Fishery on California’s Northern Channel Islands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Historical Archaeology, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03377298 |
| Authors |
Todd J. Braje, Jon M. Erlandson, Torben C. Rick |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 35% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,544,407
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Historical Archaeology
#48
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,630
of 313,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Archaeology
#11
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.