↓ Skip to main content

Bowel preparation in pediatric colonoscopy: results of an open observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Endoscopy International Open, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bowel preparation in pediatric colonoscopy: results of an open observational study
Published in
Endoscopy International Open, June 2016
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-107789
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Berger, Martin Classen, Harald Engelhardt, Klaus-Michael Keller, Martin W. Laass, Ralph Melchior, Carsten Posovszky, Burkhard Rodeck, Katharina Schaper, Rolf Behrens

Abstract

The goal of this study was to analyze the bowel cleansing methods currently used for pediatric colonoscopy in terms of effectiveness, tolerance and safety. Data from 768 colonoscopies reported by 28 centers were registered in an online database for further analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to determine how preparation methods affected the cleaning effect (Aronchick score) and the rate of adverse events (Aes) and complications. The most frequently reported cleansing agents were sodium picosulphate (54.2 %) and polyethylene-glycol (41.3 %) in various combinations. The cleaning effect was good to excellent in 72.6 % of patients. AEs during the preparation period occurred in 21.5 % of patients. Complications during endoscopy were reported in 12.1 % and were mostly mild. The different agents had no influence on the cleaning effect. In contrast the risk of AEs during preparation was significantly increased when polyethylene-glycol was used (odds ratio (OR) 2.112, P = 0.002) but reduced with the use of sodium picosulphate (OR 0.380, P < 0.001). In particular, the risk of needing a nasogastric tube to complete clean-out was about 10-fold higher when polyethylene-glycol was used. A large variety of regimens are used for bowel preparation in children. We found a good overall cleaning result independent of the agents used. Cleansing agents, on the other hand, had a significant influence on tolerance and safety.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%