↓ Skip to main content

Genetic consequences of isolation: island tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) populations and the conservation of threatened species

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Genetic consequences of isolation: island tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) populations and the conservation of threatened species
Published in
Conservation Genetics, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10592-011-0265-2
Authors

Emily J. Miller, Mark D. B. Eldridge, Keith D. Morris, Kyall R. Zenger, Catherine A. Herbert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Guatemala 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Environmental Science 5 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2012.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#539
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,783
of 145,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.