↓ Skip to main content

Developmental evolution of endosperm in basal angiosperms: evidence from Amborella (Amborellaceae), Nuphar (Nymphaeaceae), and Illicium (Illiciaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Developmental evolution of endosperm in basal angiosperms: evidence from Amborella (Amborellaceae), Nuphar (Nymphaeaceae), and Illicium (Illiciaceae)
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, October 2001
DOI 10.1007/s006060170026
Authors

S. K. Floyd, W. E. Friedman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
United States 1 2%
New Caledonia 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 24%
Professor 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Philosophy 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#146
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,507
of 43,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.