↓ Skip to main content

Moclobemide

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Moclobemide
Published in
Drugs, September 1996
DOI 10.2165/00003495-199652030-00013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bret Fulton, Paul Benfield

Abstract

Unlike older monoamine oxidase inhibitors, which irreversibly and non-selectively bind monoamine oxidase (MAO), moclobemide is a reversible and selective inhibitor of the MAO-A isozyme. Moclobemide only weakly potentiates the pressor response induced by tyramine or other indirectly acting sympathomimetics; therefore, there is no need to avoid dietary tyramine or over-the-counter decongestants with moclobemide as there is with older MAO inhibitors. Recent clinical trials and meta-analyses have confirmed the efficacy of moclobemide in the treatment of depressive disorders. Moclobemide has been shown to have similar efficacy to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and nonselective, irreversible MAO inhibitors. Long term follow-up studies of 6 to 12 months' duration have demonstrated that the antidepressant efficacy of moclobemide is maintained. Moclobemide, given alone or in combination with another antidepressant, has shown some efficacy in patients with refractory depression; however, comparative trials are required to confirm these findings. Data are also available to show clinical efficacy of moclobemide in the management of social phobia. Comparative studies have established that moclobemide is better tolerated at therapeutic dosages and has less toxicity in overdose than TCAs and nonselective, irreversible MAO inhibitors. Moclobemide lacks the anticholinergic, sedative and cardiovascular effects associated with many of the older antidepressants. Compared with SSRIs, moclobemide has a similar overall tolerability, although it tends to cause fewer gastrointestinal effects than the SSRIs and has not been reported to interfere with sexual function. In summary, recent data which confirm and extend its comparative therapeutic efficacy and low potential for adverse effects have established moclobemide as an effective treatment in depressive disorders. The drug is also effective in patients with a primary diagnosis of social phobia. Its lack of adverse anticholinergic, cardiovascular, cognitive and psychomotor effects makes moclobemide a particularly useful option in the elderly or patients with cardiac disease. The in vitro binding of moclobemide to monoamine oxidase (MAO)-A is weak but >167-fold more selective than for the MAO-B isozyme. However, its ex vivo activity against -A is more pronounced, perhaps indicating the existence of an as yet unidentified, more active metabolite. The ex vivo binding of moclobemide to MAO-A was demonstrated to be reversible, with recovery of enzyme activity within 16 hours. This is in contrast to older MAO inhibitors, which nonselectively and irreversibly bind to both MAO-A and MAO-B isozymes. The effects of moclobemide on monoamine metabolism and/or activity of monoaminergic neurons have been indirectly demonstrated in humans by reductions in plasma levels of the catecholamine metabolites homovanillic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol and the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid. In vitro, moclobemide has no appreciable affinity for muscarinic, dopaminergic, seroto-nergic, adrenergic, H1-histaminergic, benzodiazepine or opioid receptors. In oral tyramine pressor tests moclobemide enhanced the hypertensive re-sponse to oral tyramine approximately 8- and 16-fold less than tranylcypromine and phenelzine, respectively. In addition, the pressor response induced by tyramine returned to baseline within 3 days of discontinuing moclobemide, whereas baseline sensitivity did not return until 4 and 8 weeks after discontinuing tranyl-cypromine and phenelzine, respectively. In contrast to other antidepressants, moclobemide has minimal effect on REM sleep and is reported to have no effect on, or to improve, sleep continuity in depressed patients. Unlike tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), moclobemide has no reported effect on cognitive or psychomotor function. After single-dose oral administration, moclobemide is almost completely absorbed; however, oral bioavailability ranges from 44 to 69% because of substantial first-pass metabolism. After multiple doses, moclobemide is associated with increased bioavailability (>80%), possibly due to saturation of first-pass metabolism. Moclobemide is approximately 50% bound to plasma proteins and the volume of distribution ranges from 76 to 134L. Moclobemide is rapidly and extensively metabolised to at least 19 different metabolites, two of which have moderate MAO-A inhibitory activity. The elimination half-life of moclobemide is approximately 1 to 2 hours and the drug is primarily excreted renally as metabolites. Age and renal function are reported to have no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of moclobemide; however, elimination is impaired in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Recent clinical trials and meta-analyses in patients with depressive disorders have confirmed that moclobemide generally has similar efficacy to TCAs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), the MAO inhibitor tranylcypromine and maprotiline. Although results from a meta-analysis indicate that moclobemide is as effective as clomipramine, this was not the case in patients with severe depression when dosages of moclobemide of 400 mg/day or less were used. Data from meta-analyses also indicate that moclobemide has similar efficacy to TCAs when patients are classified according to severity of disease or when symptom clusters (psychic, somatic, retardation, agitation) of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) are examined separately. In studies comparing moclobemide 300 to 600 mg/day with fluoxetine 20 to 40 mg/day, the percentage of patients who responded to treatment (≥50% reduction in HDRS scores or either a ≥50% reduction in HDRS score or a final HDRS score <10) was similar (range 47 to 72% and 48 to 77%, respectively). One study reported that moclobemide and fluoxetine were associated with similar improvements in quality-of-life parameters after treatment for up to 12 weeks. Long term follow-up studies have reported that moclobemide retains its antidepressant efficacy over treatment periods of up to 12 months. In elderly patients, moclobemide was generally at least as effective as comparator antidepressants and more effective than placebo. The use of moclobemide in patients with depression that is refractory to standard therapy is primarily limited to noncomparative studies. Preliminary data indicate that combination of moclobemide with a TCA or SSRI may be effective in these patients (although the coadministration of moclobemide with antidepressants with serotonergic properties should be undertaken only with great caution). Moclobemide has been shown to be effective in the management of social phobia. Comparative 16-week data indicate moclobemide (approximately 580 mg/day) to be as effective as phenelzine (approximately 70 mg/day) in this disorder. In a subsequent study, moclobemide 600 mg/day was associated with significant global improvement relative to placebo on the Liebowitz Social Phobia Scale and on all subscales of the Clinical Impression of Change for social phobia after 12 weeks. Long-term data are also available from a nonblind trial to show clinical efficacy of moclobemide 600 to 750 mg/day over a 2-year period. Based on pooled data from clinical trials involving over 1600 patients, the frequency of the most common adverse effects did not significantly differ between moclobemide and placebo. Only dizziness, nausea and insomnia/sleep disturbance were reported more frequently in moclobemide-treated patients than placebo recipients. Moclobemide generally lacks the adverse effects associated with antidepressant drugs which bind to muscarinic (dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision, urinary retention), α1-adrenergic (hypotension) and histaminergic (sedation) receptors. In comparative trials with TCAs, moclobemide was associated with a lower frequency of adverse effects, primarily related to a lower propensity to produce anticholinergic and sedative effects. Moclobemide had a similar overall tolerability to SSRIs. However, SSRIs tended to cause more gastrointestinal adverse effects than moclobemide. Moclobemide has a relatively low frequency of adverse effects during long term treatment and is reported to be as well tolerated in the elderly as in younger patients. In cases of overdose when moclobemide was the sole ingestant, most symptoms have been relatively mild and reversible. However, several fatal cases of serotonin syndrome have been reported after multidrug overdose involving moclobemide in combination with clomipramine, citalopram or fluoxetine. Although moclobemide has been combined with serotonin reuptake inhibitors in clinical trials without evidence of the serotonin syndrome, there have been isolated case reports of this occurring when moclobemide was combined with clomipramine or fluoxetine at therapeutic dosages. Thus, these drugs should be used together only with great caution. Similarly, pethidine (meperidine) or dextro-methorphan (both of which have serotonergic properties) should be avoided in patients receiving moclobemide. Moclobemide has no reported interaction with directly acting sympathomimetic agents. Data indicate that the drug may be used with caution in combination with low dosages of indirectly acting sympathomimetics. The elimination of moclobemide is significantly reduced when it is coadministered with cimetidine. Moclobemide may be initiated at full therapeutic dosages of 300 to 450 mg/day. The maximum recommended dosage is 600 mg/day. Dietary restrictions are not required but consumption of large amounts of tyramine-rich food should be avoided. Washout periods when switching between moclobemide and other antidepressants are not required. Dosage adjustments are not needed in patients with renal dysfunction; however, moclobemide dosages should be reduced by one-third to one-half in patients with hepatic dysfunction.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 28%
Psychology 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Chemistry 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 17 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,906,861
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#715
of 3,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,779
of 30,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.