↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory Training Late After Fontan Intervention: Impact on Cardiorespiratory Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory Training Late After Fontan Intervention: Impact on Cardiorespiratory Performance
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00246-018-1808-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lamia Ait Ali, Alessandro Pingitore, Paolo Piaggi, Fabio Brucini, Mirko Passera, Marco Marotta, Alessandra Cadoni, Claudio Passino, Giosuè Catapano, Pierluigi Festa

Abstract

Fontan palliation allows patients with "single ventricle" circulation to reach adulthood with an acceptable quality of life, although exercise tolerance is significantly reduced. To assess whether controlled respiratory training (CRT) increases cardiorespiratory performance. 16 Adolescent Fontan patients (age 17. 5 ± 3.8 years) were enrolled. Patients were divided into CRT group (n = 10) and control group (C group, n = 6). Maximal cardiopulmonary test (CPT) was repeated at the end of CRT in the CRT group and after an average time of 3 months in the C group. In the CRT group a CPT endurance was also performed before and after CRT. In the CRT group there was a significant improvement in cardiovascular and respiratory response to exercise after CRT. Actually, after accounting for baseline values, the CRT group had decreased breathing respiratory reserve (- 15, 95% CI -22.3 to - 8.0, p = 0.001) and increased RR peak (+ 4.8, 95% CI 0.7-8.9, p = 0.03), VE peak (+ 13.7, 95% CI 5.6-21.7, p = 0.004), VO2 of predicted (+ 8.5, 95% CI 0.1-17.0, p = 0.05), VO2 peak (+ 4.3, 95% CI 0.3 to 8.2, p = 0.04), and VO2 workslope (+ 1.7, 95% CI 0.3-3.1, p = 0.02) as compared to the control group. Moreover, exercise endurance time increased from 8.45 to 17.7 min (p = 0.01). CRT improves cardiorespiratory performance in post-Fontan patients leading to a better aerobic capacity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 29 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 29 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,488,947
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#660
of 1,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,171
of 441,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.