↓ Skip to main content

Impact of an embedded genetic counselor on breast cancer treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Impact of an embedded genetic counselor on breast cancer treatment
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10549-017-4643-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Holly J. Pederson, Najaah Hussain, Ryan Noss, Courtney Yanda, Colin O’Rourke, Charis Eng, Stephen R. Grobmyer

Abstract

We predicted that embedding a genetic counselor within our breast practice would improve identification of high-risk individuals, timeliness of care, and appropriateness of surgical decision making. The aim of this study is to compare cancer care between 2012 and 2014, prior to embedding a genetic counselor in the breast center and following the intervention, respectively. A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with breast cancer in 2012 (n = 471) and 2014 (n = 440) was performed to assess patterns of medical genetics referral, compliance with referral, genetic testing findings, and impact on treatment. Between 2012 and 2014, patients were 49% more likely to be referred to genetics, 66% more likely to follow through with their genetic counseling appointment, experienced a 73% reduction in wait times to genetic counseling visits and 69% more likely to have genetic testing results prior to surgery. Notably, while the number of genetic mutations identified was in the expected range over both time periods (9% of those tested in 2012 vs. 6.6% of those tested in 2014), there was a 31% reduction in time to treatment in 2014 vs. 2012. Awareness of germline genetic mutations is critical in surgical decision making for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Having an experienced genetics specialist on site in a busy surgical breast clinic allows for timely access to genetic counseling and testing, and may have influenced time to treatment in our institution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,188,494
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#291
of 4,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,322
of 452,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#8
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.