Title |
The impact of using an upper-limb prosthesis on the perception of real and illusory weight differences
|
---|---|
Published in |
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.3758/s13423-017-1425-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gavin Buckingham, Johnny Parr, Greg Wood, Samuel Vine, Pan Dimitriou, Sarah Day |
Abstract |
Little is known about how human perception is affected using an upper-limb prosthesis. To shed light on this topic, we investigated how using an upper-limb prosthesis affects individuals' experience of object weight. First, we examined how a group of upper-limb amputee prosthetic users experienced real mass differences and illusory weight differences in the context of the 'size-weight' illusion. Surprisingly, the upper-limb prosthetic users reported a markedly smaller illusion than controls, despite equivalent perceptions of a real mass difference. Next, we replicated this dissociation between real and illusory weight perception in a group of nonamputees who lifted the stimuli with an upper-limb myoelectric prosthetic simulator, again noting that the prosthetic users experienced illusory, but not real, weight differences as being weaker than controls. These findings not only validate the use of a prosthetic simulator as an effective tool for investigating perception and action but also highlight a surprising dissociation between the perception of real and illusory weight differences. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 12 | 41% |
United States | 3 | 10% |
Netherlands | 3 | 10% |
Canada | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 52% |
Scientists | 11 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 14 | 23% |
Psychology | 11 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 24% |