| Title |
Template for Developing Guidelines for the Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Psychophysiological Interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1021061318355 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theodore J. La Vaque, D. Corydon Hammond, David Trudeau, Vincent Monastra, John Perry, Paul Lehrer, Douglas Matheson, Richard Sherman |
| Abstract |
An essential function of both the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (AAPB) and the Society for Neuronal Regulation (SNR) is the systematic evaluation of psychophysiological interventions that have been developed for the treatment of medical and psychiatric disorders. In order to address scientific concerns regarding the efficacy of specific clinical applications of biofeedback, these two societies formed and Efficacy Task Force. The process to be used in the assessment of treatment efficacy, specificity and clinical utility is presented in the form of a template that will serve as the foundation for a series of scientific reviews and practice guidlines to be published by both societies. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#179
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,864
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them