↓ Skip to main content

Electroencephalographic Biofeedback in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Electroencephalographic Biofeedback in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10484-005-4305-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent J. Monastra, Steven Lynn, Michael Linden, Joel F. Lubar, John Gruzelier, Theodore J. LaVaque

Abstract

Historically, pharmacological treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been considered to be the only type of interventions effective for reducing the core symptoms of this condition. However, during the past three decades, a series of case and controlled group studies examining the effects of EEG biofeedback have reported improved attention and behavioral control, increased cortical activation on quantitative electroencephalographic examination, and gains on tests of intelligence and academic achievement in response to this type of treatment. This review paper critically examines the empirical evidence, applying the efficacy guidelines jointly established by the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (AAPB) and the International Society for Neuronal Regulation (ISNR). On the basis of these scientific principles, EEG biofeedback was determined to be "probably efficacious" for the treatment of ADHD. Although significant clinical improvement was reported in approximately 75% of the patients in each of the published research studies, additional randomized, controlled group studies are needed in order to provide a better estimate of the percentage of patients with ADHD who will demonstrate such gains in clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 201 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 18%
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 21 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 84 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Neuroscience 15 7%
Engineering 12 5%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 29 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#89
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,861
of 70,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them