↓ Skip to main content

Indirekte Größenbestimmung der rezeptiven Felder der Retina beim Menschen mittels der Hermannschen Gittertäuschung

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, January 1960
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Indirekte Größenbestimmung der rezeptiven Felder der Retina beim Menschen mittels der Hermannschen Gittertäuschung
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, January 1960
DOI 10.1007/bf00680926
Authors

G. Baumgartner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 58 72%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 2%
Researcher 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 74%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Philosophy 2 2%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 5 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#476
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#545
of 7,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them