↓ Skip to main content

Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
82 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework
Published in
Trials, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2413-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Wilson, Leila Rooshenas, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Daisy Elliott, Marcus Jepson, Sean Strong, Alison Birtle, David J. Beard, Alison Halliday, Freddie C. Hamdy, Rebecca Lewis, Chris Metcalfe, Chris A. Rogers, Robert C. Stein, Jane M. Blazeby, Jenny L. Donovan

Abstract

Research has shown that recruitment to trials is a process that stretches from identifying potentially eligible patients, through eligibility assessment, to obtaining informed consent. The length and complexity of this pathway means that many patients do not have the opportunity to consider participation. This article presents the development of a simple framework to document, understand and improve the process of trial recruitment. Eight RCTs integrated a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) into the main trial, feasibility or pilot study. Part of the QRI required mapping the patient recruitment pathway using trial-specific screening and recruitment logs. A content analysis compared the logs to identify aspects of the recruitment pathway and process that were useful in monitoring and improving recruitment. Findings were synthesised to develop an optimised simple framework that can be used in a wide range of RCTs. The eight trials recorded basic information about patients screened for trial participation and randomisation outcome. Three trials systematically recorded reasons why an individual was not enrolled in the trial, and further details why they were not eligible or approached, or declined randomisation. A framework to facilitate clearer recording of the recruitment process and reasons for non-participation was developed: SEAR - Screening, to identify potentially eligible trial participants; Eligibility, assessed against the trial protocol inclusion/exclusion criteria; Approach, the provision of oral and written information and invitation to participate in the trial, and Randomised or not, with the outcome of randomisation or treatment received. The SEAR framework encourages the collection of information to identify recruitment obstacles and facilitate improvements to the recruitment process. SEAR can be adapted to monitor recruitment to most RCTs, but is likely to add most value in trials where recruitment problems are anticipated or evident. Further work to test it more widely is recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 27%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 25 27%