Title |
Bornean orangutan geophagy: analysis of ingested and control soils
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Geochemistry and Health, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10653-015-9678-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William C. Mahaney, Ronald G. V. Hancock, Susan Aufreiter, Michael W. Milner, Joan Voros |
Abstract |
Geophagy among orangutans is the most poorly documented in contrast to the knowledge of soil-eating practices of other great ape species. Observations of soil consumption by orangutans in the Sungai Wain Forest Preserve (Wanariset) of Borneo are presented, along with physico-mineral-chemical analyses of the ingested soil in an effort to understand what might stimulate the activity. The consumed soils are: light colored, not excessively weathered by normal standards, higher in the clay size fraction relative to controls, and are comprised of a mix of clay minerals without any specificity of 1:1, 2:1 and/or 2:1:1 (Si:Al) species. The geophagic soils contain chlorides below detection limits, effectively eliminating salt as a stimulus. Soil chemical and geochemical analyses confirm that orangutans prefer soils with pH levels near or above 4.0, while controls are consistently lower (pH = 3.5-4.0), a considerable difference in acidity for at least four out of six soils consumed. Geochemical analysis shows Al, Fe and K are high in the consumed vs control samples; higher Al follows from higher clay percentages in the consumed earth. Iron and K may play physiological roles, but Fe is mostly in the ferrous form (Fe(+2)) and may not be readily taken up by the animals. The preferential choice of consumed samples, with pH above 4.0 and higher clay contents, may promote a more beneficial intestinal environment. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 24% |
Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 34% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 22% |