↓ Skip to main content

Caroli's disease: central dot sign re-examined by CT arteriography and CT during arterial portography

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Caroli's disease: central dot sign re-examined by CT arteriography and CT during arterial portography
Published in
European Radiology, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s003300101048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetsuhiro Chiba, Masami Shinozaki, Shintaro Kato, Nobuaki Goto, Hajime Fujimoto, Fukuo Kondo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Researcher 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 91%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,610,011
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,159
of 4,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,812
of 309,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.