| Title |
The end of the adaptive landscape metaphor?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology & Philosophy, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10539-008-9116-z |
| Authors |
Jonathan Kaplan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 154 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 23% |
| Researcher | 37 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 44% |
| Philosophy | 14 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#320
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,564
of 82,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.