↓ Skip to main content

Fatal hyperammonemia resulting from a C-to-T mutation at a MspI site of the ornithine transcarbamylase gene

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, December 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Fatal hyperammonemia resulting from a C-to-T mutation at a MspI site of the ornithine transcarbamylase gene
Published in
Human Genetics, December 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00206063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dani�le Hentzen, Anna Pelet, Delphine Feldman, Daniel Rabier, Jacques Berthelot, Arnold Munnich

Abstract

Ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) deficiency is the most common inborn error of the urea cycle in humans and is responsible for lethal neonatal hyperammonemia in males. Partial OTC deficiency also occurs in females and can be responsible for life-threatening hyperammonemic comas in heterozygotes. The cosegregation of the trait with a 5.8-kb abnormal MspI fragment in an affected family led us to hypothesize that this unexpected migration pattern was related to the mutation event in this particular family. Using polymerase chain reaction amplification of the specific mRNA derived from a post-mortem biopsy of the liver, we found that the MspI site located in the seventh exon of the gene was abolished and we finally identified a C-to-T transition at codon 225 of the cDNA, changing a proline to a leucine in the protein. Subsequent digestion of amplified exon 7 using the restriction enzyme MspI allowed direct screening for the mutant genotype during the next pregnancy. The present study supports the view that direct detection of the mutant genotype using either Southern blotting or digestion of amplified exons of the gene can contribute to genetic counselling in noninformative families. Finally, since MspI digestions are routinely performed for restriction fragment length polymorphism-based family studies in OTC deficiency, we suggest that the possible presence of the 5.8-kb abnormal fragment should be investigated on Southern blots of affected individuals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,466
of 61,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.