↓ Skip to main content

Visual imagery can impede reasoning

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Visual imagery can impede reasoning
Published in
Memory & Cognition, April 2002
DOI 10.3758/bf03194937
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Knauff, P. N. Johnson-Laird

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 147 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 11%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 42%
Computer Science 12 7%
Linguistics 10 6%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 29 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#491
of 1,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,924
of 121,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.