↓ Skip to main content

Preferred mental models in reasoning about spatial relations

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Preferred mental models in reasoning about spatial relations
Published in
Memory & Cognition, December 2007
DOI 10.3758/bf03192939
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georg Jahn, Markus Knauff, P. N. Johnson-Laird

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
France 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 80 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Master 17 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 45%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Computer Science 7 8%
Linguistics 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#491
of 1,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,300
of 156,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.