↓ Skip to main content

Pectoralis minor transfer for elbow flexion restoration in late obstetric brachial plexus palsy

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Pectoralis minor transfer for elbow flexion restoration in late obstetric brachial plexus palsy
Published in
International Orthopaedics, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00264-017-3725-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Costil, Claudia Romana, Frank Fitoussi

Abstract

Obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) may result in a severe impairment of upper limb function, especially when major motor functions do not recover with or without early microsurgical reconstruction. Various methods to restore elbow flexion have been described. The aim of this study was to report the results after pectoralis minor transfer for elbow flexion restoration in late OBPP. Nineteen patients were included. Mean age at surgery was six years (range, 2.3-12.8). The mean follow-up period was four years (range, 1-15). Shoulder function was evaluated by the Mallet classification and hand function by the Raimondi scale. We used the "active movement scale" (AMS) to evaluate elbow flexion function. Eighteen of the 19 patients had improvement in their elbow active flexion. There was significant improvement in biceps muscle power according to the BMRC grading system, from an average grading of 1.7 (range, 1-3) pre-operatively to 3 (range, 1-4) post-operatively (P < 0.05). The average active elbow flexion was significantly improved from a mean of 81° (range, 0-120; SD = 44) pre-operatively, most of them gravity eliminated, to a mean of 111° (range, 0-140; SD = 33) post-operatively (P < 0.05). According to the AMS, 12 patients (63%) had a good result, 4 (21%) a fair result and 5 (26%) a poor result. Poor results were significantly correlated with a low pre-operative AMS score (P < 0.05). The pectoral minor transfer can be a reliable technique for elbow flexion improvement in late OBPP by strengthening an already existing but inadequate active flexion. IV.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,459,801
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#1,278
of 1,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#377,616
of 441,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.