↓ Skip to main content

Reserpine and alpha-methyldopa in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, May 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Reserpine and alpha-methyldopa in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia
Published in
Psychopharmacology, May 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf00426466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuong C. Huang, Richard I. H. Wang, Andrew Hasegawa, Luca Alverno

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,517,130
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,244
of 5,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,745
of 6,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.